On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 04:57:43PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > What, we have to be nice to the users now? ;) > > Fair enough, I'll add support for both types of channels. Should it be > possible to connect the same instance to both an ipv6 and and ipv6_sadr > channel type, or is it OK to enforce that there's only one of those > active?
It is OK to enforce that there is only one of those active. How non-SADR-aware Babel should handle SADR routes? Is it mandatory sub-TLV, so they are ignored; or optional sub-TLV, so they are handled as regular routes? -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."