On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 04:38:59PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > I did not check 2/2 yet, but i think it should support both regular
> > ipv6 and ipv6 SADR channels/tables, not just the SADR ones.
> Hmm, well, my assumption was that since sadr tables can hold normal ipv6
> routes as well, the pipe hack you were talking about would be sufficient
> to support both?

It could, but that would be cumbersome for users that just want regular
routes. The pipe hack is more for setups that integrate SADR routes from
Babel with other (non-SADR) protocols. Simple setups should keep simple

Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."

Reply via email to