>>> "Joel" == Joel E Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or maybe we want to be able to report things such as
>>
>> exp: exp %type <int>{ $$=$1; } '+' exp { $$ = $2 + $4; };
>>
>> or without the %type?
> Something like that seems more reasonable since it's an explicit
> declaration as when declaring types for symbols. However, I think
> we can add %destructor by type now,
I definitely in favor of per-type %printers and %destructor! The
above proposal, btw, makes both happy.
