"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. If Bison finds <tag> usage (once you're done with your patch for this), > then it should assume the user will define YYSTYPE as a union. This > subcase should be no different from the case where the user declares > %union, right?
Right. > 2. If Bison finds no <tag> usage, then destructors by type make no sense, > so perhaps Bison should report an error if the user declares such > destructors. However, destructors by symbol do still make sense. A > catch-all destructor makes sense too, I think. I agree with this as well.
