Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only catch, is that I compiled with -02. If you compile with out > optimizations it seems to be 1-2% slower, don't know why that is.
That's OK. Thanks. > Actually, I thought the LALR(1) was the yacc skeleton, but apparently it > is its own skeleton. Does bison not test the yacc skeleton against the > Calculator example? If not, I don't have any nice tests to run. In this > case, what examples should I run the push parser against? Sorry, I don't know the answer to either question offhand. Perhaps you can modify the tests so that the yacc skeleton is tested against the calc example.
