Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, I see. So, currently, when you choose push-parser, I have the > skeleton generate a function prototype: > void yyparse (void *PVVOID); > > Do you suggest I keep this functionality, and allow the user to use > the %parse-param option on top of that? or do you suggest I should > not automatically generate the "void *PVVOID" parameter, and force the > user to use %pase-param along with %push-parser?
I was thinking the latter. It's more type-safe. And it's simpler not to give the user an option they don't really need.
