On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > OK, I reviewed that patch and installed the following > slightly-different one. The main thing was that funny union, which > confused me, and so I replaced it with a char const * value and a char > * storage pointer (which might be null, but can be freed).
Thanks, I'll look it over later today. > "make maintainer-check-valgrind" has a lot of failures still, but I > assume more patches will come later? I had no failures after my original patch. I'll review this one later.
