On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > > > The %destructor is only needed with output language C. > > > > Currently, it's also useful for C++. > > You mean, of one writes code in the common C/C++ subset. :-)
I think you, Akim, and I have all agreed that semantic types cannot have C++ destructors given Bison's current C++ skeletons. You need %destructor instead. That's what I'm referring to. > > Ok, I hope you'll respond to my other email where I propose a more concise > > alternative to exp($sum, @sum). > > I will look at this, but tomorrow - it is getting late here. :-) Thanks.
