On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 2 Dec 2006, at 21:40, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > > > > Is this right? In 2.3a, there is %require that ensures Bison version, > > > > > but > > > > > no > > > > > %requires inserting code. ANd %define can be used to insert code. > > > > > > > > Right. > > > > > > Right what? > > > > Everything you and I said is right. > > Your entering the realms of linguistic cryptology causes problems for
I don't know for sure what that means. My best guess is that you think I was trying to confuse you. In reality, I thought I was answering your (what appeared to be) very simple question, but I guess not. >, as I > wanted to give a principle as to why macro for code placement and other macro > should not be mixed. Akim was earlier opposed to a %code for code placement, > instead putting it into %define. From what you say, %code has another meaning, > and %requires is used to place code, and I cannot immediately check what they > actually do. Deadlock. I just made a post to help-bison that describes these directives. Maybe that'll help. In the future, if making a local checkout of CVS Bison is not possible for you, you can always browse it online at Savannah. I just assumed you knew that.
