On 4 Dec 2006, at 22:55, Joel E. Denny wrote:
Or so, was my idea with %code. I am not sure what the idea is to now add a much more lmited variation of that command - evidently it is not in 2.3.a.Does this not satisfy your needs? %define "NAME" { CODE }
Apart from the ugly, redundant quotes around the macro name, there might be problems in the future, if the code part should be parsed according to language. Then %define is better reserved for verbatim macros, and %code for code placement.
Hans Aberg
