On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My opinion is just that three different rules to give an output file > > name (%language, -y, default) are too much. > > I'd say "simple" is the way to go here. This area is already far too > complicated.
Assuming always declaring %language will be the recommended right way to use Bison, I'd say it's simpler if ".tab" is always dropped in that case regardless of the output language. If I understood Paolo's last message about DJGPP (which I know nothing about), it also means %language would make Bison grammars more portable. However, I suppose I'm outvoted, and this just isn't worth the time for my purposes, so I'll drop it.
