"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Historically, the Bison mainline is not >> really designed for experimentation. > > How were developing features handled in the past?
They were designed right the first time. :-) Seriously, though, this business about "experimental" is kind of demoralizing for users who are reading the manual. Why should they invest their work in an "experimental" feature? >> Perhaps we should move the the experimental features to a branch. On >> that branch, it'd be OK to describe stuff as experimental in the >> manual. > > CVS branching? Yes, that's what I meant.
