On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 10:33 +0100, Holger Freyther wrote: > Solution/Process: > a) Ask Holger Schurig, Chris, Richard, Marcin, Tim, Sebastian > (frankengul) to relicense the code to MIT > b) GPL the whole tree, it is legal to relicense the BSD bits (when > keeping the headers) to GPL and we only need to use CC for the > manual/css > MIT makes sense for OE itself. For bitbake, I would like to be able to ask for modifications to the source to be available so I think the GPL licence makes more sense for bitbake?
I also have a very strong dislike of the "Version 2 or later clause" as I don't trust later versions and allowing code to be distributed under a licence I haven't seen is madness. I'm open to persuasion but at the moment I see GPL as a slightly better option. I hate licensing... Richard _______________________________________________ Bitbake-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-dev
