On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:48 +0100, Torne Wuff wrote: > I have a project that I think could benefit from something like bitbake > to replace the nightmare of makefile gibberish currently used to build > it. The build system currently has to build a crosscompiler toolchain, > build some host-side programs, crosscompile some libraries, crosscompile > programs that use those libraries, build those programs into various > archives/filesystems, and then turn them into a ROM image. This seems > awfully reminiscent of my experience using OE, and I'm wondering how > feasible it would be to use bitbake for it :) > > Is it reasonably possible to set up a project that uses bitbake without > the OE files? How do you get to the point where it can build something?
This is something totally reasonable to use bitbake for. It would be a question of setting up conf and class files defining tasks that do what you need them to do. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Bitbake-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-dev
