A potential good candidate is defmacro construct. There might be other uses.
Constantine
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
I'm interested why BitC continues the Lisp tradition of underuse of
brackets. Note: I do not question the prefix expression notation here.
There are other bracket symbols beyond rounnd ones ([] and {} come to
mind immediately; there are also unicode symbols, but there are
important reasons for not going out of ASCII). I believe that there have
been good reasons for it in lisp conception time. Are these reasons
still valid?
A potential good candidate is defmacro construct. There might be other uses.
A potential good candidate is defmacro construct. There might be other uses.
- Re: [bitc-dev] Underuse of brackets Constantine Plotnikov
- Re: [bitc-dev] Underuse of brackets Jonathan S. Shapiro
