On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 21:29 +0600, Constantine Plotnikov wrote: > I'm interested why BitC continues the Lisp tradition of underuse of > brackets...
Two reasons: 1. More brackets makes for more complicated ASTs later. 2. We are going to need other bracketing syntaxes for other purposes in the logic-related part of the languge. shap _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
