hi, > The issue that I have NOT addressed here is the issue of subtyping and > supporting syntax. That clearly needs to be addressed, and we will > address it in a future note.
Does that mean y'all have it worked out already? I am concerned, given how fraught-with-peril most OO implementations really are (fragile base classes, diamond problems, yadda cubed), that adding objects to BitC could start to add some unfortunate gotchyas. If you have plans to address those things, that would be great :-) sincerely. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
