Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > So to answer your question: I think we have alternatives that fill some > of the gaps, but in general, no, I don't think that we have any grand > new inventions in the area of objects. What is really happening here is > that implementing this very relatively simplistic object system proves > to be much simpler than generalized existential types, and addresses all > of the use cases that concern us.
Are these difficulties with existentials described anywhere? Sandro _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
