On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:20 PM, William Leslie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 August 2010 15:22, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this smell like it might work? If so, then the whole thing becomes > > purely a matter of surface syntax. > > Sure. Can I still specify a concrete calling convention for a > parameter or field? Do I need to specify the calling convention of > exported functions? If not, what is the default? > I don't understand the question. The calling convention is defined by the underlying platform. The proposed rule is that given a chain of arrows, the right-most thing is the return value. If the return value is a function, it must be parenthesized. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
