2010/8/12 Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]>: > Hmm. It occur to me that there may be a "middle position" on arity handling. > We could record the arity information for purposes of type computation, but > disregard it for purposes of type compatibility.
Does not it encourage switching to different calling conventions implicitly? Doesn't this have a cost? -- Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
