On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Ben Kloosterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is implicit conversions such a bad thing in general? > Yes. It essentially destroys the ability to do type inference. The only places where BitC does implicit conversion is at copy boundaries, and there only w.r.t. mutability. I'm actually surprised that we got away with that much. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
