Instead of SIMD built into the compiler, what would be the downsides in
having a generic assembly function( like C's asm but with a type signature)
and putting SIMD into a support library (a support library that could be
made to support things like OpenCL)? A support library could also have a
reference implementation for vanilla instruction sets.
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to