On 11/04/2012 6:24 PM, wren ng thornton wrote: > On 4/10/12 6:11 AM, David Jeske wrote: >> I do not understand the significance of your observation. AFAIK, every >> currently shipping software collector, for every language system, requires >> an unpredictable world-stop. If I am mis-informed, please point me to one >> that does not.
I previously pointed out on-the-fly reference counting collectors as a counter example. On-the-fly collectors interleave collection with the mutator, so they don't suffer high latencies or stop the world. The overheads are higher, but they are naturally concurrent and incremental. See my previous note where I replied to you after I replied to Jonathan. Sandro _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
