On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> looking forwards to BitC! i'll be able to stop my search! assuming it > as an FFI to C, and a back-end for mobile device cpu types :-) ... > Backend yes. FFI over my dead and screaming body, but of necessity yes. > mainly i've been looking at gc papers wondering if i (ok not really me > in reality but somebody) could modify some extant language like > haxe/hxcpp or ocaml or whatever to take advantage of these > developments in gcs. It's unfortunate that the interfaces to different GCs from the compiler perspective are so very different. No common GC api has emerged, and the optimization requirements vary quite a lot. It makes substitutions hard to do.
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
