On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code, > using the same thresholds as BIP66.
I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the
IsSuperMajority() mechanism:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351
Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.
I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG)
soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable to
BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.
Once merged I'll prepare a backport of the soft-fork logic for the
v0.10.x branch as well.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000dbc12bdcb4d0a340272edd649d24849f86a20d075f0dba1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
