On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code, > > using the same thresholds as BIP66. > > I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the > IsSuperMajority() mechanism: > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351 > > Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet. > > I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG) > soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable > to > BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65. > ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority. -- Pieter
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
