On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:15:31PM +0700, Venzen Khaosan wrote: > > Do what's best for Bitcoin and define what needs to get done to > > agree to a simple block size increase to a static 8MB. > > And this then leads back to the core issue: if an 8MB blocksize > excludes many on this list from testnet, then the proposed 8MB blocks > will exclude a lot of mainnet participants (miners) and degrade the > quality of diversity and decentralization. > > How about testing at double the capacity: 2MB?
Which of course raises another issue: if that was the plan, then all you can do is double capacity, with no clear way to scaling beyond that. Why bother? -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000001599522de3e8ed28f0189ddccfa1d6db5eb380cacffc79d7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
