bitcoin-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 25.0 released Michael Ford via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev Digest, Vol 96, Issue 58 ecurrencyhodler via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Transaction Relay over Nostr Joost Jager via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Transaction Relay over Nostr alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Transaction Relay over Nostr Joost Jager via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY Ben Carman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Burak Keceli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Burak Keceli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution G. Andrew Stone via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Burak Keceli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Burak Keceli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution adiabat via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution Burak Keceli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 23.2 released Michael Ford via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 24.1 released Michael Ford via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 24.1 released Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev
  • [bitcoin-dev] Full-RBF Peering Bitcoin Core v24.1 Released Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Stake Certificates and Web-of-Stakes: privacy-preserving proving UTXOs attributes in P2P systems Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] libsecp256k1 0.3.2 released Tim Ruffing via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] ZeroSync: Introducing Validity Proofs to Bitcoin Robin Linus via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] ZeroSync: Introducing Validity Proofs to Bitcoin Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] ZeroSync: Introducing Validity Proofs to Bitcoin Robin Linus via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Interactive Payment Batching w/ Payjoin Dan Gould via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosures and Bitcoin development alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Aleksandr Kwaskoff via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data Moth via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data Moth via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Witness script validation to reject arbitrary data angus via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Kalle Rosenbaum via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Andrew Baine via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes? Melvin Carvalho via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A payout scheme for a non custodial mining pool F M via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A payout scheme for a non custodial mining pool Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Formosa --- proposed improvement upon BIP39 Yuri S VB via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Formosa --- proposed improvement upon BIP39 Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Formosa --- proposed improvement upon BIP39 Yuri S VB via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization Weiji Guo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] proposal: new opcode OP_ZKP to enable ZKP-based spending authorization ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On adaptor security (in protocols) AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] MyCitadel wallet v1.3 advances time-locked multi-sigs further Dr Olga Ukolova via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Spiral is Hiring Bitcoin Wizards Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Vaults in the MATT framework Salvatore Ingala via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Vaults in the MATT framework Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Vaults in the MATT framework Salvatore Ingala via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] TARO Protocol metadata BIP proposal Adam Ivansky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] TARO Protocol metadata BIP proposal Andrew Melnychuk Oseen via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on merge decisions Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 6th Meeting, Tuesday 18 Apr. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to Remove BIP35 P2P 'mempool' Message Will Clark via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to Remove BIP35 P2P 'mempool' Message David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to Remove BIP35 P2P 'mempool' Message 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Civ Kit: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Market System Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Civ Kit: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Market System Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Civ Kit: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Market System Chris Stewart via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement Dr Maxim Orlovsky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement Federico Tenga via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement Dr Maxim Orlovsky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement Dr Maxim Orlovsky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RGB protocol announcement Dr Maxim Orlovsky via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] libsecp256k1 v0.3.1 released Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP Murch via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP darosior via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP Vincenzo Palazzo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP josibake via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin fungibility and inscribed sats alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin fungibility and inscribed sats Kree Love via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin ungibility and inscribed sats Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 5th Meeting, Tuesday 21 Mar. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Trust minimized swaps using PSBT, SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY and nostr alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Nadav Ivgi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees WMOURA via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Andrew Melnychuk Oseen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts Rastislav Budinsky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts HcaFc_jbe via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts shymaa arafat via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-inquistion 24.0 Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] About the Japanese list defined in BIP39 XEM Book via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Andrew Melnychuk Oseen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev

• Earlier messages