I keep seeing (on /r/bitcoin) mentions of a 24-hour or 48-hour (varying accounts) interval at which miners clear their mempools. Is this a matter of local policy or something Bitcoin Core does by design?
On Saturday, 11 July 2015, at 5:29 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote: > It sounds like you are seeking transaction expiration from the mempool, not > CPFP. > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Dan Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think a compromise will be somewhere in the middle. I think most people > > would be OK with TXs that don't have enough fees for P2P transfer to stay > > in deadmans land. Most people are stuck in a situation where they payed > > enough to get it into (and keep it in) the pool, but not enough to get it > > out. > > > > If we could get CPFP that only worked on TXs that met the minimum > > threshold for peer propagation, then I think we would be in much better > > position to battle this spam flood. > > > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Micha Bailey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are > >> evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for > >> relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol > >> doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol > >> message to signify that they should be evaluated together. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
