Le 20/07/2015 17:14, Mike Hearn a écrit : > > By "alias" you mean domain name? I'm not sure what DNS key means in this > context. >
yes, sorry, I mean the domain name corresponding to the TXT record. it's called 'alias' in the context of OpenAlias. > I'm still not really convinced that a domain name under some new roots is > an identity people will want to use, but yes, I guess your approach would > work for those who do want it. What do you mean by "under some new roots" ? If I believe Netki, there is enough people who want to have a Bitcoin address stored in DNS, for at least one company to thrive. :) All I am proposing is a new usage for these already existing DNS records; not only to receive BTC, but also to sign requests with them. > It still may be worth exploring the compact cert+optimized BIP70 (no > DNSSEC) in a qrcode if making a network that stores small bits of data > really is beyond us :( > Heh, pastebin + base64 encoding the PR could work. However, it might violate their ToS. More seriously, there might be some legal issues for a company willing to provide that kind of service. Re QR codes: 150 bytes, using base43 encoding, is not too bad. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
