bitcoin-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 5th Meeting, Tuesday 21 Mar. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Trust minimized swaps using PSBT, SINGLE|ANYONECANPAY and nostr alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in testnet and signet Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Nadav Ivgi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees WMOURA via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Andrew Melnychuk Oseen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum fees vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts Rastislav Budinsky via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts HcaFc_jbe via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts shymaa arafat via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Fee-redistribution contracts David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32 Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-inquistion 24.0 Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] About the Japanese list defined in BIP39 XEM Book via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Andrew Melnychuk Oseen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Zac Greenwood via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Steve Lee via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Zac Greenwood via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Brandon Black via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 4rd Meeting, Tuesday 21 Feb. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 4rd Meeting, Tuesday 21 Feb. 18:00 UTC Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Yuval Kogman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Lloyd Fournier via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Nadav Ivgi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Yuval Kogman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty protocols with Taproot inputs Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Rijndael via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Casey Rodarmor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Purely off-chain coin colouring alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Costless bribes against time-sensitive protocols Gleb Naumenko via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Rijndael via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Claus Ehrenberg via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reference example bech32m address for future segwit versions Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits rot13maxi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Melvin Carvalho via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Claus Ehrenberg via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A Universal Coin Swap system based on bitcoin and a Bitcoin NFT system Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Universal Coin Swap system based on bitcoin and a Bitcoin NFT system Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys darosior via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Wallet vaults with pre-signed transactions but no ephemeral keys Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Serverless Payjoin Dan Gould via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Serverless Payjoin alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Fabian via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Kostas Karasavvas via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning niftynei via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Vincenzo Palazzo via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] A new Bitcoin implementation integrated with Core Lightning Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Using OP_VAULT to improve DLCs Ben Carman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using OP_VAULT to improve DLCs Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH_GROUP vs Ephemeral anchors Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] SIGHASH_GROUP vs Ephemeral anchors Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty Protocols Significantly More Expensive Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal rot13maxi via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_VAULT: a new vault proposal Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev

• Earlier messages
• Later messages