On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Mike Hearn <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's worth noting that even massive companies with $30M USD of funding >> don't run a single Bitcoin Core node > > > This has nothing to do with block sizes, and everything to do with Core > not directly providing the services businesses actually want. > > The whole "node count is falling because of block sizes" is nothing more > than conjecture presented as fact. The existence of multiple companies who > could easily afford to do this but don't because they perceive it as > valueless should be a wakeup call there. > Regardless of why node count is falling, many people who used to run a full node stopped doing so. To mitigate that, their chances of getting something out of it have to be greater. What if propagating a valid transaction generated a small chance of earning a piece of the fee?
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
