> On Jul 28, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogel...@me.com> > wrote: > > >> Enter a “temporary” anti-spam measure - a one megabyte block size limit. >> Let’s test this out, then increase it once we see how things work. So far so >> good… >> > > The block size limit was put in place as an anti-DoS measure (monster > blocks), not "anti-spam". It was never intended to have any economic effect, > not on spam and not on any future fee market. > > > jp >
I’m using spam and DoS somewhat synonymously here, although you’re correct - DoS is a more accurate term.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
