On 19 August 2015 at 12:42, Jameson Lopp <jameson.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you can actually come up with a technical solution that allows for a node > operator to prove to the rest of the network that they are running an honest > full node that hosts the entire blockchain, then you can move forward with a > direct monetary incentivization proposal. To my knowledge no one has been > successful in that endeavor. To be more clear, your proposal would need to > be able to differentiate between a full node and a pseudonode. > https://github.com/basil00/PseudoNode
The proof is in the validation of transactions. How can a node reliably validate transactions unless it has the past history of transactions? Entire blockchain not required or necessary, but that's a plus. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
