On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Joseph Poon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev > wrote: >> If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up. >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179 > > I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt. > > It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool > transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower > is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are > transactions with "higher priority".
That policy code should be simple to change, but thank you for pointing it out. Also thank you for declaring your position (indifference) on the subject. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
