On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Seperately, to Mark and Btcdrank: Adding an extra wrinkel to the > discussion has any thought been given to represent one block with more > than one increment? This would leave additional space for future > signaling, or allow, for example, higher resolution numbers for a > sharechain commitement.
No, I don't think anybody thought about this. I just explained this to Pieter using "for example, 10 instead of 1". He suggested 600 increments so that it is more similar to timestamps. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
