On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/21/2015 5:01 PM, Peter Todd wrote: >> >>> I checked the scenario where only the radio is on, and found the car >>> does not crash. >> Incidentally, what's your acceptable revenue difference between a small >> (1% hashing power) and large (%30 hashing power) miner, all else being >> equal? (remember that we shouldn't preclude variance reduction >> techniques such as p2pool and pooled-solo mode) >> >> Equally, what kind of attacks on miners do you think we need to be able to >> resist? E.g. DoS attacks, hacking, etc. >> > > None of this is in the scope of Pieter's simulation. > > If you think that casts doubt on my conclusions, then it casts doubt on > his original conclusions as well.
As far as I know, "his conclusions" were that there was an effect, while suspending judgement on whether that effect was high enough to be important for a given size or not. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
