On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote: > Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen > which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that > it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is > distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but > not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some > proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?
Yes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it. Looks good to me. Wladimir _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
