On 26 August 2015 at 01:29, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > For instance, a very simple toy example that would work is just XORing your > vote with SHA256(the entire blockchain)
Uh, that would totally not work. I think my proposal of using CLTV to lock coins (votes) is better. Failing a soft-fork to implement that in time, counting votes from the UTXO set is also ok - the difference between that and CLTV is that it is not as strong an evidence of commitment. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
