Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> writes: > Eric, that would be, I think, my sequencenumbers2 branch in which nSequence > is an explicit relative lock-time field (unless the most significant bit is > set). That has absolutely clear semantics. You should comment on #6312 > where this is being discussed.
Indeed. Simplicity wins. We have half the number space left for the future, too. If people are paranoid, reserve the top *two* bits. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
