On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Timón" <jti...@jtimon.cc> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn <he...@vinumeris.com> wrote: > >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually disappear > > > > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its memory pool > > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks forever until > > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for weeks after > > P2SH triggered. > > > > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() can do this, > > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any miner that > > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard. > > That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.
Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as explained by Greg Maxwell.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
