On 10/5/2015 1:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator contributors > that disagree.
Since Gavin Andresen chose you to be one of 4 people who decides whose contributions are accepted to the Core project, shouldn't you recuse yourself from referencing "regular contributor" as some kind of bar to an opinion being worthy? You don't want to be accused of squelching a person's opinions by nacking or sitting on commits, then turning around and branding those opinions as worthless because they are not from a "regular contributor." Do you? _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev