On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 04:30:56PM +0200, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > BIP68 and BIP112 collectively define the CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY semantics, <snip>
Another issue that came to mind re: CSV review is that there isn't actually any one pull-req with all the code changes together, making it hard to be sure what the final effect will be once all three BIPs are merged. While evaluating stuff separately is often good, I think this is a case where the overall design needs to be evaluated as a single unit to fully understand the behavior. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000de60f807a5fd32057510e7715038ecbc888052861b6a5c1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
