On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 04:30:56PM +0200, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP68 and BIP112 collectively define the CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY semantics,

Another issue that came to mind re: CSV review is that there isn't
actually any one pull-req with all the code changes together, making it
hard to be sure what the final effect will be once all three BIPs are

While evaluating stuff separately is often good, I think this is a case
where the overall design needs to be evaluated as a single unit to fully
understand the behavior.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

bitcoin-dev mailing list

Reply via email to