Going back on topic, I believe libconsensus shouldn't depend on any particular database because assuming it will continue to be stateless (the current libbitcoinconsensus is stateless) end therefore has no storage. I know some people disagree in various degrees. At the same time, the parts of the consensus rules verification that depends on storage has not been encapsulated out to libbitcoinconsensus yet, and I agree that changing the database is unnecessarily risky at this point. Even when the consensus rules are encapsulated, that doesn't mean that Bitcoin Core should be DB agnostic or that we can guarantee that it will follow the longest valid chain with databases that have not been tested. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [patch] Swi... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [patch]... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... telemaco via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [p... Peter R via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] [patch] Switching Bitcoi... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
