This is an interesting approach but I don't see how this is a soft fork. (Just because something is not a hard fork, doesn't make it a soft fork by definition) Softforks don't require any nodes to upgrade. [1] Nonetheless, as I understand your approach, it requires nodes to upgrade. Otherwise they are missing all transactions but the coinbase transactions. Thus, they cannot update their utxoset and are easily susceptible to double spends...
Am I missing something obvious? -- Marco [1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Softfork#Implications _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
