> The specification itself looks like an inefficient and bloaty reinvention > of > version bits.
The actual assignment of version bits isn't clear from the specification. Are you saying that any implementation that wants to propose a change is encouraged to pick a free version bit and use it? Furthermore, my proposal addresses the danger of forward-incompatible changes; a hard-fork can no longer occur as every implementation will agree on the active the set of rules even if it has not implemented them. This seems to be lacking in the version bits proposal. Tomas _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
