On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Luke Dashjr <[email protected]> wrote: > - BIP 46 is missing from the repository, but apparently self-soft-assigned > by > Tier Nolan in > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-April/005545.html > ; if this was later assigned official, or if he is still > interested in pursuing this, it seems logical to just keep it at BIP 46. >
I was never officially assigned any number for this. Subsequent P2SH changes give the required functionality in an alternative way. This renders the BIP obsolete. I suggest marking the number as nonassignable, in order to prevent confusion with archive searches. I assume that new BIP numbers will be greater than 100 anyway. As was pointed out at the time, I shouldn't have used a number in the original git branch before being assigned it officially.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
