I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out well enough to actually build something on top of, but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress.
I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack of response or discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned project. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 18:32 Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 5:46:36 PM Peter Todd wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > > > Author: Flavien Charlon <flav...@charlon.net> > > > > What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned? > > I was waiting for clarification on the Author thing, but Nicholas hasn't > responded yet. I am unaware of any reason NOT to assign it, and there > appear > to be no objections, so let's call it BIP 160. > > Luke > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
