> I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I > also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out > well enough to actually build something on top of, > There are many colored coin protocols in use. OpenAssets is probably the most popular one, but it has many critical flaws IMHO. https://github.com/bitcoinx/colored-coin-tools/wiki/OpenAssets-deficiencies
> but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress. > The protocol is not a work-in-progress, it is already in use, you cannot change it without breaking stuff. The doc can be improved, though. There is a lot of fluff but the actual important stuff gets just few ambiguous sentences. I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack of response or > discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned project. > The original author, Flavien, have abandoned it, he now does a private blockchain thing, OpenChain. There are others who still use OpenAssets, e.g. Nicolas, but the protocol can't be changed. There are other colored coin protocols in existence/in development, though.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
