Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have activated.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should > progress to > Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear > on > whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals > requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process > BIPs. Background of this discussion is at: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413 > (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing > this > topic to the mailing list) > > Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that: > - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9 > -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class > - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully > -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted > status, > but also Final status > -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status > > If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs > 9, > 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I > also > need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to > (and > beyond) Accepted. > > BIP 9: Pieter Wuille <[email protected]> > Peter Todd <[email protected]> > Greg Maxwell <[email protected]> > Rusty Russell <[email protected]> > > BIP 68: Mark Friedenbach <[email protected]> > BtcDrak <[email protected]> > Nicolas Dorier <[email protected]> > kinoshitajona <[email protected]> > > BIP 112: BtcDrak <[email protected]> > Mark Friedenbach <[email protected]> > Eric Lombrozo <[email protected]> > > BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <[email protected]> > Mark Friedenbach <[email protected]> >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
